Methodology
How we score, and what we will not do
Every score on this site comes from reviews other people wrote. We did not write them, we did not collect them, and we do not test products ourselves. Here is exactly what we do.
What the Coyscore actually is
The Coyscore is a 0–100 composite built by Coy from publicly available customer reviews of the same product across multiple retailers. It is not a star rating, it is not our opinion, and it is not a measurement — nobody at The Snug Report has used these products and we do not claim to have.
The composite draws on subscores where the review text supports them: how easy a product is to use, how it is rated for body safety, how satisfied buyers were, and whether they felt it was worth the money. Where a subscore has too little behind it, it is not used. That last sentence is the one that matters, and it is the next section.
Scores are grouped into four grades. Across the 110 products we currently score:
- Coy Approved
- Coy Recommended
- Worth a Look
- Mixed Reviews
What counts as evidence
A public customer review of the specific product, published by a retailer that sells it. Not a press mention, not a blog, not a comment, not anything we were sent.
We publish the count on every review page, because a score built on 12 reviews and a score built on 483 are not the same kind of claim and you should be able to tell them apart at a glance. Right now 94 of 110 products carry 50 or more reviews — 25,158 in total across the catalogue.
One thing we currently cannot show you. We say the score aggregates reviews "across multiple retailers", and it does — but the number of retailers behind each individual product is not in the dataset this site builds from. Every review page shows that field as "Not recorded" rather than leaving the space blank. We would rather admit the gap than let the layout imply we filled it.
What "Gathering reviews" means
Some products do not have enough public reviews to score honestly. Those are marked Gathering reviews. It does not mean the product is bad, and it does not mean we dislike it. It means we do not have enough to say anything, so we say that instead of inventing a number.
A product marked Gathering reviews never appears in a ranking and never carries a score. When enough reviews exist, it gets one — and the page will say when the evidence was gathered, as every page here does.
Of the 110 products published on this site today, none are in that state: the whole set cleared the confidence threshold before it was published. Products that did not clear it are simply not here yet.
What we will not rank on
A subscore can exist as a field on a product and still be empty. Ranking on whether the field exists, rather than whether it holds a value, would let us publish "the quietest anal vibrators, ranked" off a single data point and present it as if it were fifty.
We rank only on these: beginner_friendliness, body_safe, ease, performance, satisfaction, value, and on the Coyscore composite.
These exist in the data and are deliberately not used:
| Subscore | Products with the field | Products with a value |
|---|---|---|
| battery | 51 | 6 |
| quietness | 51 | 1 |
| size accuracy | 59 | 22 |
This is enforced in the build, not in a style guide: a page that tries to rank on one of those fields fails to compile.
Specifications, and the ones we do not have
Specifications come from the supplier's own product data. We normalise them — insertable length parsed out of the size field, porosity read from the supplier's material description — and we record where each one came from.
Three specifications we do not have for any product: maximum diameter, taper, and flared base. No supplier in this catalogue publishes them.
We could infer a flared base from the fact that something is sold as a butt plug. We will not. That is a statement about a category presented as a fact about a product, and a flared base is the one attribute in this category where being wrong sends somebody to an emergency department. Every spec table on this site shows those three rows as Not stated rather than hiding them, because a missing row reads as "this product does not have one".
Material is stated by the supplier for 80 of 110 products. Of those, 48 are non-porous and 29 are porous and cannot be sterilised. For 33 we have nothing to go on.
What we do not do
- We do not sell scores.
- We do not review units sent to us in exchange for coverage.
- We do not test products ourselves.
- We do not publish star ratings as our own.
- We do not give medical advice.
- We do not hide who owns this.
When we are wrong
Supplier data is wrong sometimes and so are we. Every page carries the date the evidence was gathered and the date the page was rebuilt, so you can see how stale a claim is.
If a specification on this site is wrong — particularly a material or a length — tell us and we will correct it and re-publish. A correction is cheaper than a reputation.
Who publishes this. The Snug Report is published by the team behind Coy, a New Zealand retailer that stocks many of the products reviewed here. We say so on every page. Our scores come from aggregated public reviews, not from us — the method is on the methodology page and the evidence count is on every review.
We do not carry advertising and we do not accept payment to review or to score a product. What we do and do not do.